Economics is my favourite subject, (apart from
my hobby of leek growing) and through of all my years of
study, I have become a great believer in defending the
European Union's unique brand of free market
economics.
I believe that successful corporations should
generally be privately owned, (providing that the
European Commission approves of the owner), so that
they can generate the wealth that the EU Politicians
require for redistribution.
Without competition, no wealth can be created, so in
order to finance the taxation for our European vision,
defending free market economics is essential.
While of course, we at the EU want to see successful
corporations, we also do not want to see any injustice
and in a dog eat dog world, it is always disturbing to
see some companies fail as a result of ruthless
competition.
So while maintaining the essentials of free market
economics, I still think it is very important for
profitable, successful, private companies to take
their responsibility seriously and subsidize through
taxation, those businesses which are unable to succeed
on the basis of ability in the market place.
Wealth redistribution is more important than wealth
creation.
Some economists claim that by forcing companies to
assist in this way is like the government smashing a
shopkeeper's window in order to create work for an
unemployed glazier, but I say that is nonsense.
Companies who succeed through honest effort, without
subsidy or government favours, must recognize that
their success is at the expense of those who are
inefficient and that they owe a humanitarian duty to
help.
The greatest good for the greatest number is my
philosophy and this applies just as much to the
European National economies as to private business and
that is the reason for subordinating the various
national economies into one "super" European economy
by means of the single currency.